Volume 8, Issue 6, December 2019, Page: 173-178
A Review of Psychology of Science
Xi Yanhui, Department of Sociology, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
Li Jianshan, School of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
Received: Oct. 11, 2019;       Accepted: Dec. 19, 2019;       Published: Dec. 30, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20190806.15      View  299      Downloads  99
Abstract
As an important part of the metascience, psychology of science serves a crucial sector of the science research from the perspective of humanities and social science. In the 1930s, psychology of science began to sprout, but in the following decades psychology of science was relatively silent, with few iconic achievements, and was rarely valued. Since the 1970s, due to the outstanding contributions of Kuhn's paradigm theory, psychology of science has been widely recognized. Since the mid-1980s, psychology of science research has gradually brought together researchers and produced a series of important achievements. The discipline of psychology of science has been formally established. In general, the subjects of psychology of science mainly include psychology of scientific creation, social psychology of science, and psychology of scientist personality. In China, Wang Jisheng made pioneering contributions in the study of psychology of science in the mid-1980s, but psychology of science had few achievements in 1990s to the 2010s, and the results are also mainly concentrated on the scientific image. Since 2013, the research of psychology of science in Chinese have gradually increased, the theoretical discussion of psychology of science has increased, and the exploration of the autonomy has begun to show. All in all, the development of psychology of science still needs more scholars to join, and needs the recognition and attention of the academic community.
Keywords
Psychology of Science, Social Psychology of Science, China, Wang Jisheng
To cite this article
Xi Yanhui, Li Jianshan, A Review of Psychology of Science, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 173-178. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20190806.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
II. A. Рачков. Science of science: problem, structure, and basic principles. Han Bingcheng etc. translation. Peking: Science Press, 1984, p. 177.
[2]
Quoted from Kou Yu. Psychology of science: a new direction of philosophy of science. Shandong University, 2013, pp. 17-18.
[3]
R. W. Proctor, and E. J. Capaldi, Eds. Psychology of science: implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, contents.
[4]
G. J. Feist, and M. E. Gorman, Eds. Handbook of the psychology of science. New York: Spring publishing company, 2013, contents.
[5]
R. J. Sternberg, (2000). Books etcetera: Origins of genius by Dean K. Simmonton (Oxford University Press, 1999). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 246-247.
[6]
S. Dasgupta. (2010). On the blind-mindedness of creative thought comment on “Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: combinatorial models of exceptional creativity” by Dean Keith Simonton. Physics of Life Reviews, 2, 188-189.
[7]
R. K. Merton, Sociology of science. Lu Xudong, Lin Ju Ren translation. Peking: Commercial Press. 2003, p. 515.
[8]
A. H. Maslow. Psychology of science. Lin Fang translation. Kunming: Yunnan People's Publishing House. 1988, p. 19.
[9]
W. R. Shadish, and F. Fuller, Eds. The social psychology of science. New York: The Guilford Press, 1994, p. 19.
[10]
R. Glassman. Review Articles: Psychology of science/ theology of science: reaching out or narrowing? Journal of Religion and Science, 42 (3), 651-659.
[11]
quoted from W. R. Shadish, and F. Fuller, Eds. The social psychology of science. New York: The Guilford Press, 1994, pp. 5-6.
[12]
J. Ziman. An introduction to meta science. Liu Junjun, Zhang Ping and Meng Jianwei translation. Changsha: Hunan People's Publishing House. 1988, p. 246.
[13]
Wang Jisheng. Psychology of science. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press, 1986, preface p. 6.
[14]
Wang Huaping (2014). The cognitive turn of scientific theory: toward psychology of science. Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology, 6, 21-28.
[15]
Li Jihong, Yang Jianye, Li Xiaogang. Science image. Peking: Science Press, p. 129.
[16]
Zhao Lingli. (2007). Artistic image, aesthetic image and scientific image: theoretic and empirical conception of the similarities and differences of psychological image of creative activities. Research on Dialectics of Nature, 7 104-110.
[17]
D. Carré (2019). Towards a cultural psychology of science. Culture & Psychology, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p3-32.
[18]
José E. Garcia (2016). An Early Psychology of Science in Paraguay. Journal of Educational Psychology - Propósitos y Representaciones, v4 n2 p. 387-412.
Browse journals by subject